Non-Reducibility with Knowledge wh: Experimental Investigations DRAFT - DO NOT CIRCULATE WITHOUT PERMISSION
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most accounts of knowledge wh seek to reduce it to knowledge that. That is, facts about answer knowledge are deemed sufficient to determine the truth value of knowledge wh statements. George (2011, 2013) argues against the possibility of such a reduction. On George’s proposal, standing in the knowledge wh relation to a question requires the agent to both know at least one answer and not believe any
منابع مشابه
Knowing-‘wh’, Mention-Some Readings, and Non-Reducibility
This paper presents a new criticism of reductive approaches to knowledge-‘wh’ (i.e., those approaches on which whether one stands in the knowledge-‘wh’ relation to a question is determined by whether one stands in the knowledge-‘that’ relation to some answer(s) to the question). It argues in particular that the truth of a knowledge-‘wh’ attribution like ‘Janna knows where she can buy an Italian...
متن کاملارزیابی پیشنویس سازمان جهانی مالکیت فکری برای حمایت از طب سنتی
Along with the wide and global acceptance of traditional medicine as a valuable treasure of rules and local customs for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases, economic benefits arising from traditional medicine have attracted pharmaceutical multinationals to utilize this knowledge that is mainly created by the indigenous and local communities in developing countries to produce new...
متن کاملThe SILK Language
SILK (Semantic Inferencing for Large Knowledge) is an advanced knowledge representation language combining the latest work in theory, non-monotonic reasoning, business rules, and the Semantic Web. It is designed to be sufficiently expressive and scalable to support large challenges including Project Halo. This evolving document is the authoritative reference on the features, syntax, and semanti...
متن کاملSolving the Puzzle of Human Cooperation
Draft 1.2: Do not cite in any context without permission of authors.
متن کامل